<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.2" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What Went Wrong</title>
	<link>http://www.mythic-cartography.org/2007/10/04/what-went-wrong/</link>
	<description>Revitalizing Riddles, Mythic Story, Family, Village and Land.</description>
	<pubDate>Sun,  1 Aug 2010 07:05:23 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ryan Hurd</title>
		<link>http://www.mythic-cartography.org/2007/10/04/what-went-wrong/#comment-22982</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan Hurd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2007 03:04:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.mythic-cartography.org/2007/10/04/what-went-wrong/#comment-22982</guid>
		<description>thanks for the thoughtful post.  i just found your blog and look forward to exploring more.  one thing that occured to me as i read this is how indigenous science does not try to separate reality into the observer/observed like western science.  this is a much more honest place for empiricism to begin!   as such, our biases (and the worldwiew that comes with it) are actually our inroads to the phenomena.  that level of participation is flawed, like you say, but also crucial to any development of a knowledge base.  thanks again. .</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thanks for the thoughtful post.  i just found your blog and look forward to exploring more.  one thing that occured to me as i read this is how indigenous science does not try to separate reality into the observer/observed like western science.  this is a much more honest place for empiricism to begin!   as such, our biases (and the worldwiew that comes with it) are actually our inroads to the phenomena.  that level of participation is flawed, like you say, but also crucial to any development of a knowledge base.  thanks again. .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
